Excommunicate the DLC(Libs Demand Dems Removed From Dem Party!)

MyDD ^ | Fri Sep 15, 2006 | Jonathan Singer

[tcrlaf]

"The Democratic Party, and even the centrists within it, must sever all ties with Al From and the DLC. They must not be allowed access to Democratic Congressional leaders.

They must not be allowed a role in the nomination process in 2008. They must not be allowed a presence at the Democratic convention.

By supporting Bloomberg, Al From and the DLC have indicated they no longer are interested in participating in the Democratic Party and we should see to it that they get their way."

[tcrlaf]

This is about the DLC Reps attending a meeting about Bloomberg running as an independent candidate for President....

Has anybody reminded the NutRoots that Dems took away any say they had in the Dem nomination process, by moving the first primary to a Machine-Controlled State yet???

[TimesDomain]

Which are the Liberals and which are the progressive socialists (communists)?

There are
social liberal / fiscally conservative
social liberal / fiscally liberal

The above two are patriotic Americans with a different way of seeing things - but believe in the Constitutional Republic. It appears that they are now called moderate-republicans

socialist liberals
monarchist liberals (many in the RNC fit into this one)
communist liberals
anarchist liberals (really stupid ones like the DU)

Now HOW are they going to seperate these?

[REDWOOD99]

The nutroots don't own the dems....Karl Rove owns the dems. He has decided Hillary will be the next sacrificial candidate for President.

[darkangel82]

The DLC are no different, they're sh*tbag socialists just like the rest of the party.

[Little Bill]

This gets better and better, I love it when they eat their own.

[Billthedrill]

Traditionally Party purity has been maintained by private executions, although the occasional ice axe to the head has been employed as an ad hoc solution. The Comrades are a little short of revolutionary zeal here, but they'll work up to it.

[tcrlaf]

Which would go a long way to explaining why Dems want Bloomberg to run as an independent??

He can self-finance, and split the republican/Independent vote..

[GreyFriar]

Yes, the party must be purged of all those who do not conform or follow the dictates of the leadership. (h'mmm sounds like how Lenin ran his party)

[darkangel82]

Bloomberg wouldn't get 0.5% of the republican vote nationwide.

[Christopher Lincoln]

From the DLC's website:

Chair of the DLC's American Dream Iniative[sic]: U.S. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY)

Wheels within wheels.

[TimesDomain]

they're sh*tbag socialists just like the rest of the party

So you think that ALL socialism is inherently evil, and should be all wrapped up in the same fish-paper?

The USA is already close to socialist in some areas. By definition, in a socialist state, the govt owns and operates all public/national transportation, utitlities, etc. Anything that is considered "national need". There is private property and companies.

a Communist state owns and controls everything - there is no private property only the state's.

In a capitalist country is private.

Then you can throw in the monarchies (a cross between socialism, fascism, communism (this is the DNC of today) The RICH own everything - the govt controls the sheeples who get the bread crumbs - appreciatively (is this a word?)

The USA is somewhere in the mix of capitalist, socialist, and monarchist states - we currently lean more capitalist.

The extremist of the RNC want us towards the capitalist fascist state - the extremist in the DNC want us in the monarchist/communist state.

Throw in the Anarchists, left & right, libertarians, etc and we have -- the improbable United States of America - as long as we can keep her - as somebody once said.

But is we do not reign in and strap down these lawyers and their Masters in black robes, we will see what it was once like to live under the rule of King Henry VIII.

[darkangel82]

Thank you for that rehash of today's DNC talking points. Any last words before the zot?

[TimesDomain]

Ignorance is bliss , eh?

[darkangel82]

What ARe you talking about, jack*ss?

[TimesDomain]

well, I guess that's why they call it Flori-DUH!

Maybe if you could come up with even one iota of adult comment - discussion - fact - rebuttal ??

Prove me wrong?

I didn't think so. Debates are for those with some semblance of intelligence.

[darkangel82]

And there goes another one.

[zot]

Thanks for the Leninist purge ping. They way the RATS got rid of Lieberman is a good example.