Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Libloather

Why wasn't Clinton supporting Massood who was fighting the Taliban and Bin Laden? This was a clear case of "fighting the terrorists over there so we don't have to fight them here."


48 posted on 09/12/2006 5:32:02 PM PDT by gusopol3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: gusopol3
The Clinton admin just simply missed it here. He didn't want to work with Massoud because Massoud trafficked heroin, engaged in atrocities, etc...all good rationalizations...but the admin at the same time overlooked the Taliban's various flaws that made them no better of a choice.

Yet because Clinton wanted to obtain his objectives: stability, get bin Laden, build an oil pipeline, please the Pakis, to name a few, he tried to treat the Taliban as the legitimate govt. He simply didn't want to see that the Taliban were harboring and protecting bin Laden and lying to our faces about it.

BTW, read Ghost Wars by Steve Coll. Long read, but excellently traces the history of how bin Laden came to be (and all the players involved) from the Soviet invasion to 9/11.

It is also interesting that the Bush II admin had decided to go after bin Laden in late April of '01 and finalized a plan to use Massoud (with backing of Pashtun Hamid Karzai and other tribal leaders) a week before 9/11.

106 posted on 09/12/2006 7:53:57 PM PDT by Free Vulcan (Show them no mercy, for you shall receive none!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson