To: OldFriend
Who says Iger lied? He said "appropriate" edits.
I'm sure Brucie et al. took that to mean "edits with which we agree and which paint The Sinkmeister and his staff as the Saviors of the world."
Seems Iger had a different definition of "appropriate," that's all.
17 posted on
09/12/2006 5:15:20 PM PDT by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
To: wouldntbprudent
No doubt Rush's commentary on how Iger did not edit more than a minute must be galling the dems no end.
Rush went on and on.......tee hee. Oh the dems are being played big time.
And they fell into the trap big time.
They ought to change their name to the WHINING party. They're not even embarrassed.
24 posted on
09/12/2006 5:17:51 PM PDT by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: wouldntbprudent
Seems Iger had a different definition of "appropriate," that's all.
Are you saying that it all depends on what your definition of the word 'is' is in the phrase 'what is appropriate'? :)
31 posted on
09/12/2006 5:20:55 PM PDT by
hardworking
(Please elect Comrade Clinton so that I can go on the dole too. Thank you.)
To: wouldntbprudent
Exactly, it all depends on what the meaning of "appropriate" is.
63 posted on
09/12/2006 5:56:58 PM PDT by
Fudd Fan
(Some pray for peace; I pray for VICTORY that will ensure it.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson