Skip to comments.
Clinton's Lawyers Say Iger Assured "Appropriate Edits" And Hammer Film As "Disgraceful"
TPM Cafe ^
| 9/11/06
| Greg Sargent
Posted on 09/12/2006 4:56:56 PM PDT by Libloather
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
*Bubba and his hacks better be putting out some facts to combat what the entire planet watched. Otherwise, they really do need to shut their pie holes...
Chair of the 9/11 Commission Gov. Thomas H. Kean from the series "The Path to 9/11" during a press tour in July 2006. US network ABC aired the 'docudrama' late Sunday, despite angry claims by aides to former president Bill Clinton that it unfairly tarred his record on hunting terrorists.(AFP/Getty Images/File)
Screenwriter/Producer Cyrus Nowrasteh from the series "The Path to 9/11" during a press tour in July 2006. (AFP/Getty Images)
Executive Producer Marc Platt from the series "The Path to 9/11" during a press tour in July 2006. AFP/Getty Images/File)
To: Libloather
Not a single mention of Gorelick or the Gorelick Wall.
2
posted on
09/12/2006 4:58:32 PM PDT
by
BenLurkin
("The entire remedy is with the people." - W. H. Harrison)
To: Libloather
3
posted on
09/12/2006 4:59:35 PM PDT
by
golfisnr1
(look at a map)
To: Libloather
You don't get it, folks, Bill Clinton has no power. Disney's chief could care less what Clinton and his Clintonites say or think. That's a fact!!!
To: BenLurkin
You didn't see the scene where the CIA guys couldn't share information with O'Neill.
Gorelick wasn't named, but the buck didn't stop with her.
5
posted on
09/12/2006 5:02:02 PM PDT
by
rwilson99
(95% of Al-Jazzera Viewers Agree... the world is less safe (for them) since 9/11)
To: Libloather
This sort of slanderous outrage never would have occurred if Michael Eisner were still head of Disney!
</sarcasm>
6
posted on
09/12/2006 5:05:02 PM PDT
by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: Libloather
Tee hee. Anyone surprised Iger lied! That is precisely what the dems do LIE LIE LIE and MISREPRESENT.
7
posted on
09/12/2006 5:09:50 PM PDT
by
OldFriend
(I Pledge Allegiance to the Flag.....and My Heart to the Soldier Who Protects It.)
To: Libloather
Why would anyone in tarnation give any credence to what these PROVEN liars for 8+ years of the Clinton adm have said about this movie as not being factual?
Iger to Bruce Linsay...Go pound sand!
8
posted on
09/12/2006 5:09:53 PM PDT
by
sirchtruth
(No one has the RIGHT not to be offended...)
To: Libloather
Apparently Clinton got lewinskied by ABC.
To: Libloather
Poor Bill. The world is still all about damage control on his reputation.
10
posted on
09/12/2006 5:10:57 PM PDT
by
Earthdweller
(All reality is based on faith in something.)
To: Libloather
How can you defame a rapist!
11
posted on
09/12/2006 5:11:53 PM PDT
by
mystery-ak
(My Son, My Soldier, My Hero..............)
To: BenLurkin
Thats what I was thinking.
I have some advice for the Clinton lawyers.
Sue ABC and then maybe the producers will put Jamie Gorick under oath.
To: Libloather
slick should get on his knees and thank the Lord that the film didn't go into more detail regarding his responsibility for the situation his administration put us in relative to terrorism.
To: Libloather
Their choice of words--"disgraceful",,,is very appropriate, coming from a group that should know the meaning of that word.
There isn't a more "DISGRACEFUL" group of malcontents in the world than the cult of Clinton 'butt-kissers'.
To: Earthdweller
Poor Bill. The world is still all about damage control on his reputation. As it will be, for the rest of his life.
15
posted on
09/12/2006 5:13:33 PM PDT
by
COBOL2Java
(Freedom isn't free, but the men and women of the military will pay most of your share)
To: Libloather
Hey, Bubba-pants, those were appropriate edits. You didn't want Iger to lie for you now, did you?
To: OldFriend
Who says Iger lied? He said "appropriate" edits.
I'm sure Brucie et al. took that to mean "edits with which we agree and which paint The Sinkmeister and his staff as the Saviors of the world."
Seems Iger had a different definition of "appropriate," that's all.
17
posted on
09/12/2006 5:15:20 PM PDT
by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
To: BenLurkin
Not a single mention of Gorelick or the Gorelick Wall. Well, they did infer it..numerous times.
18
posted on
09/12/2006 5:15:26 PM PDT
by
evad
(sarcasm may be introduced at any moment of any post)
To: Libloather
Correct me if I'm wrong but if you happen to present a different opinion that the "911 Commission" you must keep it to yourself.
I'm following this story to see which of the Clintonites mentioned in the film brings a law suit forward, including the toon. If not, it must have been pretty accurate.
19
posted on
09/12/2006 5:16:02 PM PDT
by
kempster
To: tennmountainman
Exactly---that's what I want, for these jokers to put their money where their mouth is and sue ABC.
((crickets chirping))
20
posted on
09/12/2006 5:16:22 PM PDT
by
wouldntbprudent
(If you can: Contribute more (babies) to the next generation of God-fearing American Patriots!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson