Uh, umm, how to respond.
1.) "This thread is a fraud."
What? I posted an editorial in
The Oregonian. That started a debate, and that's what Free Republic is all about, right?
2.) Ad hominem attack
Your
ad hominem attack on people reveals more about you and your arguments than about the people you attacked. The material in
The Oregonian changes 0% by your attacking others, but you have revealed a near 100% failure in the ability to argue against what's in that editorial since you choose instead to attack some fellow Freeper who posted the editorial.
Your loss, not mine.
3.) "masquerading business interests"
I'm not a business interest. I'm another parent who's kid has been sexualized by the ALA, only I'm acting to do something about it. There's only so much porn the ALA can push on children before people start taking action to stop the
porn pushers.