[stylin19a]

John F. Harris and Susan Schmidt wrote, “The documents that Berger has acknowledged taking — some of which remain missing — are different drafts of a January 2000 ‘after-action review’ of how the government responded to terrorism plots at the turn of the millennium. The document was written by White House anti-terrorism coordinator Richard A. Clarke, at Berger’s direction when he was in government.”

These documents went to all the Clinton admininstartion big shots. They returned them with notes in the margins. Those handwritten notes would have absolutley destroyed x42i and his hand pupputs in the 911 hearings.

[sandra_789]

Exactly.

That's why they sent Burglar in.

[supercat]

These documents went to all the Clinton admininstartion big shots. They returned them with notes in the margins. Those handwritten notes would have absolutley destroyed x42i and his hand pupputs in the 911 hearings.

Exactly. If a document has a note written in the margin by WJC, almost regardless of what the note says, it would be rather hard for the President to deny having seen it (if the note was something like "Cindy (good fun) 212-555-1234" it might not show that he noticed the content of the document, but anything having to do with the document would be incriminating).

Thus the need to destroy them.