Which brings me neatly back to my original point: you sound exactly the same as the people you oppose.
There is nothing solved, remedied or resolved by their violence. Short of genocide, what will you achieve that is so different from their objectives? Have you nothing better to offer than more violence?
Sound like but with different motives and originating intentions. My motive is to eliminate a threat to global peace and security. My originating intention is their actions as terrorists and resolve to never quite until all of my friends and family are dead. See, there is a very big difference between them and me, or people like me. We don't "want" to kill them, as they do us, we "have" to kill them, because if we don't they will do everything they can to kill us. In addition they will pass on that attitude to others who might be gullible enough to believe them. As we thin their numbers, it is my hope that more people who are exposed to their rhetoric will understand that they are wrong and we are right.
L
Let see, in your eyes "not having missiles hitting your houses" was not an objective and "standing there while your family and neighbors are killed by shelling and people with bombs strapped around there waist" was peace, but when you go kill the people with the bombs before they come to you it turns into violence.
I don't think you exhibit a thought process that I can reason with.