Posted on 08/10/2006 8:38:11 PM PDT by PRePublic
Exterminate the lineage of Hezzbollah and any other radical Islamist organization. Every man, woman, and child is a potential threat, and can clearly be used as a weapon. They have redesignated themselves from being human beings to being lethal weapons. Therefore, that is how they and their kind must be seen. If you want to disarm the terrorists, you must take every weapon they posses, and that includes the breathing ones as well.
You sound remarkably like the idiots you are describing.
Blowing up the other guy's kids will only make look like he is right. If you that is your aim, you might as well blow yourself up and leave us a note blaming the other guy.
The last bunch of people who redisgnated human beings as sub-human were the Nazis - not the most glorious example of a brave new world that anyone would want to live in.
1 Samuel 15 KJV
1 Samuel also said unto Saul, The LORD sent me to anoint thee to be king over his people, over Israel: now therefore hearken thou unto the voice of the words of the LORD.
2 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, I remember that which Amalek did to Israel, how he laid wait for him in the way, when he came up from Egypt.
3 Now go and smite Amalek, and utterly destroy all that they have, and spare them not; but slay both man and woman, infant and suckling, ox and sheep, camel and ass.
I agree, many of them offer themselves for this "holy" Satanic cult.
Your wrong, the last guys to do that were in Rhawanda Africa. Oh, and I don't designate them as sub-human. To be human, IMO, you have to act like a human, which they don't.
In essence, they're Inhuman.
Thanks CheneyChick. I was going to post that, but I couldn't remember the verse. Guess they messed that mission up big time!!
No, Monekywrench, the Nazis were the Nazis. The Jihadi-fascists were just the latest variation on death cults ranging from the Thuggees of India and to Western occultists.
They may talk like the Nazis but if you try tackling the future by looking in the rearview mirror, don't be surprised if it doesn't turn out like last time, the way you expected.
I readily agree that jihadi-fascists’ acts are definitely inhuman, but they themselves are still human beings and reclassifying them only excuses their actions. We must hold them to account as human beings. When we resort to their methods to establish our supremacy we undermine our own position and authority. Down that route lie the generations of conflict such as have been seen in Ireland, and the Middle East.
My point was that to redefine people as anything other than strictly human is the first step down a very dark path, as you cited with your reference to Rwanda. That, too, started with words and escalated to genocide. That started quietly with terms of abuse and grew. It grew in the fertile soil of hatred and malice that was the product of generations of enmity and murder (in the 1920s, 50’s and 70’s). What happens when we inculcate our children to regard other people as anything less than human beings is that we end up living in Rwanda in 1994.
You don't get my point do you? I don't have a superiority complex at all. I only see them as inhuman scum that deserve the quickest route to meet their maker possible. I really am not interested in their classification other than DEAD.
Hmmm. Re-reading my last post, it was ambiguous. When I used the term 'supremacy', I should have used the term 'moral authority', so I hope you didn't take that to imply anything else.
Since my morals seem to be above those of terrorists and Islamofacists, I would say I have a moral authority to eliminate them as a threat, as does this administration and it's allies.
Which brings me neatly back to my original point: you sound exactly the same as the people you oppose.
There is nothing solved, remedied or resolved by their violence. Short of genocide, what will you achieve that is so different from their objectives? Have you nothing better to offer than more violence?
Sound like but with different motives and originating intentions. My motive is to eliminate a threat to global peace and security. My originating intention is their actions as terrorists and resolve to never quite until all of my friends and family are dead. See, there is a very big difference between them and me, or people like me. We don't "want" to kill them, as they do us, we "have" to kill them, because if we don't they will do everything they can to kill us. In addition they will pass on that attitude to others who might be gullible enough to believe them. As we thin their numbers, it is my hope that more people who are exposed to their rhetoric will understand that they are wrong and we are right.
L
If you are referring to LeMay’s declaration that “that if the war is shortened by a single day, the attack will have served its purpose." [referring to the firestorm attacks on Tokyo, etc in 1945), the argument was applied to a known enemy in a time of regular military warfare.
One might also quote those who declared it a good idea to concentrate Japanese Americans in camps to prevent a possible fifth column on the Pacific coast. The fact that similar measures were not enforced against German Americans members and that fact the most highly decorated regiment in the US Army in WWII was that consisting of Japanese Americans, might suggest that this sort of segregation by race or religion is the act of someone aiding the enemy.
The apparent growth of support for Hezbollah in Lebbonon since Isreal’s bombing campaign would suggest that either they didn’t “thin their numbers” enough or that the policy of bombing people into agreement doesn’t work.
The other suggestion by Lurker (see post 17) would seem to be carpet bombing the Middle East until there are no pockets of defiance. Given the financial cost of such a campaign it would have to be done using nuclear weapons and I doubt Israel would thank anyone for the subsequent radiation.
Judge that for yourself, but I remain unconvinced.
We are at war, and we know who the enemy is.
One might also quote those who declared it a good idea to concentrate Japanese Americans in camps to prevent a possible fifth column on the Pacific coast
I'd point out that there were no fifth column attacks on the West Coast.
The fact that similar measures were not enforced against German Americans members
Look into what was done to the German American Bundh sometime.
L
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.