To: phoenix0468
It should perform it's role as it was intended, and leave most law, that does not affect interstate commerce or activity, to the states.The role it has assumed in "regulating interstate commerce" is a far cry from what was intended, too.
40 posted on
08/08/2006 8:44:22 PM PDT by
tacticalogic
("Oh bother!" said Pooh, as he chambered his last round.)
To: tacticalogic
Well, I don't completely agree with that. Interstate commerce is something the Federal government has a valid right and reason to get involved with.
41 posted on
08/08/2006 8:47:23 PM PDT by
phoenix0468
(http://www.mylocalforum.com -- Go Speak Your Mind.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson