Replies

Which part of this exactly do you think is untrue Howlin?

If you don't mind, could you point up which parts you find to be either false or particularly unbelievable? If it's not too much trouble I would most appreciate some evidence which tends to prove your assertion that Mr. Simcoxs' response is worthy of being an episode of Ripleys.

I ask you because on the Duke threads you're particularly adept at pointing up holes in someones arguments and you usually take more than a single sentence to do so. Here you've just posted a one word 'hit and run' kind of thing. That's not your usual style.

I mean you can usually back stuff like that up with some facts, figures, a timeline, or some references to case law or something. Here you did none of that.

After all it was just about 72 hours or so ago you were wondering why noone from the MM had responded. Now he's done it and this is all you can say? That's kind of sad, don't you think?

Oh well you work on it and get back to us. I'm sure if you work with the Amnesty Brain Trust for a few minutes you'll be able to come up with something.

TIA.