LOL!
Do you know the different venues of law?
Do you know the difference between an inalienable right to defend yourself and the right to keep and bear arms?
Self defense is a natural, inalienable right. No government, or political subdivision, can deny your exercising that right, and it doesn't matter whether you use a Glock or a glockenspiel to do it.
It is outside the reach of their authority, PERIOD. Just because government doesn't acknowledge that right doesn't mean that right doesn't exist.
The right to keep and bear arms is a positive law, or man made right, and reinforces our natural right of self defense by specifying an object which we can do it with. It doesn't ban or prohibit anything, it just says "Yep, there it is!"
Do you know the difference between a declaratory and a restrictive clause?
-----
Learn to live with that proof -- as it cannot be logically denied.
And I showed you where the States retain supremacy in their jurisdictional areas....so your 'proof' went *POOF*!
LOL! Do you know the different venues of law?
I now know you won't answer the question. -- Sad that you laugh it off.
Do you know the difference between an inalienable right to defend yourself and the right to keep and bear arms?
There is none, as most any type of property I own can be used as an arm or weapon.