Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Hi Heels

She was very careful to not directly threaten the child, but she was scarily lawyerly about it. The purpose of her comments were to make Jeff afraid for his child. I don't know if that is illegal per se, but it should be.


119 posted on 07/10/2006 4:34:18 PM PDT by stands2reason (ANAGRAM for the day: Socialist twaddle == Tact is disallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies ]


To: stands2reason
I'm not sure if it's illegal either. Sounds like something that might be covered by RICO (implied threats, intimidation, u.s.w.), but I'm not a lawyer, nor have I talked to one for more than a few minutes.
Having read some of her subsequent posts,and some of her previous writings, she seems to be trying to establish herself as insane. Each of her apologies builds herself up as the victim of this. As a doctor of psychology, she's acutely familiar with the symptoms of sociopathic behavior.
This highlights a terrible failure in our criminal justice system. Sociopaths are incorrigible. They can fly below the radar, proving themselves to be no danger to themselves or others. When the disease is real, it can lie in wait, much like the chicken pox virus which sometimes manifests itself in adults as shingles.
Fact is, true sociopaths are more dangerous than a two dollar pistol. So are lucid adults who want to do harm to others and know how to fake it.
Both types need to be, one way or another, removed from society.
121 posted on 07/10/2006 5:48:57 PM PDT by Paul Heinzman (The death penalty is a deterrent: The executed is forever deterred from killing anyone again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 119 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson