Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Lurking Libertarian

But wouldn't dismissal of the civil case be partly based on this?

"In Parsons, the court vacated a forfeiture order, which means that the government's forfeiture claim against Lay for $43.5 million will be dismissed."

If the government cannot persue it's claim then I don't see how a civil case would prevail or even be considered by the court.

You are right tho. You can sue anyone you want, but whether you are going to prevail is a whole different matter.


20 posted on 07/06/2006 2:13:35 PM PDT by Bigh4u2 (Denial is the first requirement to be a liberal)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: Bigh4u2
If the government cannot persue it's claim then I don't see how a civil case would prevail or even be considered by the court.

The Government's forfeiture claim will be dismissed, because forfeiture is a criminal penalty. Civil claims for damages by injured parties can continue.

21 posted on 07/06/2006 2:26:33 PM PDT by Lurking Libertarian (Non sub homine, sed sub Deo et lege)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson