Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: connell

You should be able to provide examples without needing to quote FReepers. And If you read through some of those linked threads (some are Snopes links and some are FR threads about Snopes links), you will find even more examples (just follow the rabbit down the hole).

The more you can do to quote Snopes' own statements, rather than a FReeper's interpetation of their statements, the more people will agree with what you present as evidence of Snopes' bias.

I only learned about their take on the buses today (when searching for some examples). There was an FR thread. You might try searching threads for headlines with the word Snopes or keyword Snopes.


20 posted on 06/07/2006 8:36:19 AM PDT by weegee (Slowly but surely and deliberately, converativism is being made a thoughtcrime.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: weegee

Yep---was really just planning to use the links. Just wanted to be polite about making use of the research efforts of others (tho' I suppose that describes most of scholarly history, at least postions thereof). Thanks. CC


21 posted on 06/07/2006 9:24:14 AM PDT by connell (Christopher from ModernConservative.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson