[andyk]

looks to me like 5 referred to 3. i found the article a bit offensive, you?

Negative. 5 referred to 2. Yes, the gist of the article is offensive. We need to be exposed to the thought processes of the enemy. The "to" field in my post 5 holds the key...Well, that and the fact that I referred to post 3 as the post to emulate (by referring to upchuck).

FReegards.

[kinoxi]

ok