This article is talking about marriage. It is insinuating that Laura, because she doesn't think it should be a campaign issue, has a view different from her husband, and therefore will 'hurt' his stand among social conservatives.......stupid speculation in the first place.
But you have even taken it a step farther by accusing him of lying, and accusing them both of not believing that marriage is between a man and a woman........even more stupid speculation. You have no proof with which to make the accusation, so you changed the subject. But the fact of the matter is, that if the President came out in favor of civil unions, it would lessen your accusation that he is a liar even more, because if he were just trying to pull the wool over our stupid social conservatives' eyes.......why would he do such a thing?
It is not 'affection' for the President that makes me argue this point. It is a keen interest in having the truth be told about what he has said and done............and you have an unfortunate habit of neglecting to do that.
Your premise is based on your complete lack of respect for President Bush. You could learn a lot about honor if you paid closer attention to him.
Might I suggest that you join the newly formed Freeper Natalie Maines Fan Club? She feels the same way that you do about him.......
Civil unions are marriage by another name. Anyone claiming to be for gay civil unions but not gay marriage is dishonest.