[conserv13]

Huh. Is it appropriate for these agents to criticise the President like this?

[RodgerD]

Yes. LE Protective Associations can do that. Good thing in this case.

[gopwinsin04]

Don't they take an oath or something?

[mlc9852]

Sure, just as long as they don't criticize him on Iraq. /s

[processing please hold]

Huh. Is it appropriate for these agents to criticise the President like this?

Let's see if they'll be called into the principles office shortly and within a few days make a different statement.

[trubluolyguy]

Is it appropriate for these agents to criticise the President like this?

---

They are criticizing the plan, not the man. And no, no one is above criticism. We have no king.

[meyer]

Huh. Is it appropriate for these agents to criticise the President like this?

The first amendment says "yes".

[Marine Inspector]

Yes, it's called the 1st Amendment.

[isrul]

Not only is it appropriate. It's their obligation. They're the ones who put themselves on the line. The ones risking their lives. They're the ones actually trying to keep the invaders out. Not Bush or the Senate

They have credibility, regardless of the fact that they belong to a union.

[teawithmisswilliams]

Huh. Is it appropriate for these agents to criticise the President like this?

Since these Americans are on the front lines of this invasion, and our President is tacitly supporting said invasion, I would say they have a duty as citizens to criticize him. "Nation of laws, and not of men," and all that.