Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Conservativegreatgrandma
They ran against Bush--not Gore or Kerry. Do they really want me to believe that Bush is more dangerous than a Democrat?

No. You run against the person whos votes your trying to get. You think a Conservative is going to get a liberals votes? Thats why in things called "Primarys" Republicans run against Republicans and Democraps run against Democraps. In the case of the 3rd party its trying to wedge its way into the voting block your trying to get. Perot was a weak spined leader with a great idea. We now need a strong spined leader with a great idea to get a 3rd party working

130 posted on 05/18/2006 5:42:18 AM PDT by Bommer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: Bommer
No. You run against the person whos votes your trying to get. You think a Conservative is going to get a liberals votes? Thats why in things called "Primarys" Republicans run against Republicans and Democraps run against Democraps. In the case of the 3rd party its trying to wedge its way into the voting block your trying to get. Perot was a weak spined leader with a great idea. We now need a strong spined leader with a great idea to get a 3rd party working

Granted, but they themselves were willing to live under a Democrat president rather than Bush by attempting to siphon off enough votes from Bush to throw it to Gore or Kerry.

They cared more about themselves than their country.

We live in a swing state and we heard their ads repeatedly. Both candidates were fighting for our electoral votes but the CP and Buchanan kept attacking Bush. Shame on them. I have no use for them.

208 posted on 05/18/2006 4:52:32 PM PDT by Conservativegreatgrandma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 130 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson