Replies

You guys are either not bothering to read what I wrote carefully or do not understand it.

In the case I mentioned a search on peoplescube or thepeoplesbcube or peoples (and) cube or thepeoplescube.com did not return hits, yet a search on "thepeoplescube.com", did.

I repeat, a search on thepeoplescube.com did not return hits. A search "thepeoplescube.com" did. I am fully aware of the value of using quotes to limit search results to a specific order of the words in the search. That is not what was happening in that case and may also apply to this one.

Here's what I found when I typed in thepeoplescube.com at Yahoo: I did not use " "

The People's Cube - Correct Opinions for Progressive Liberals - Political Humor & Satire
... your letters to Ahmadinejad here: redsquare@thepeoplescube.com ... The People's Cube" (ThePeoplesCube.com) was purged from Google ... one from Google to ThePeoplesCube.com. We tried American ...www.thepeoplescube.com - 282k - Cached - More from this site - Save
The People's Cube - Progressive Truth Generator(TM)
For people's activists: a brainstorming tool that will boost your creativity and hopefully result in a surge of extremely useful and vibrant organizations, groups, fronts, initiatives, leagues, unions, centers, and movements. Unite! Organize! ...www.thepeoplescube.com/Rhetoric/index.php - 6k - Cached - More from this site - Save
Groupthink :: Cafepress.com Censors The People's Cube
... See more on this in the People's Blog: http://www.thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=313 ... http://www.thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=309 ... and I will now ...www.thepeoplescube.com/red/viewtopic.php?t=309 - 260k - Cached - More from this site - Save

You guys are either not bothering to read what I wrote carefully or do not understand it.

Actually, I don't think you wrote it all that carefully in the first place.

In the case I mentioned a search on peoplescube or thepeoplesbcube or peoples (and) cube or thepeoplescube.com did not return hits, yet a search on "thepeoplescube.com", did.

None of this information was in your previous post. It's rather unfair for you to expect other members of FR to read your mind when you mention (but do not provide a link to): "...a similar thread regarding http://thepeoplescube.com/ several months ago."

I guess I'll agree to disagree. I personally find it easy enough to enter "the People's Cube". I ran that and found it at 1st. I'll try to find that other thread. Hope I didn't misunderstand again.

I checked out that thread. What effect does that have on this? The People's Cube was wrong about that too. I did tons of variations of that and they all worked. Just that one weak example. If you directly search that www.thepeoplescube or thepeoplescube.com or many others you still find it.

If there was some accidental mistake(yes, they do happen) apparently it's been fixed. Again, I hope I didn't misunderstand you.