A change in the definition of marriage is not needed (I'm the first to oppose it), just a decriminalization of polygamy would be sufficient.
"just a decriminalization of polygamy would be sufficient."
yeah right. Then you'll want to marry your siblings, aunts and uncles, etc.
Are you trying to give a new meaning to "relativism"?
Ok, maybe 40 years later, when you have settled a family with 4 wives and 35 children.......
Can you tell me who is really supporting these large families??? Its not easy to support 6 children and give them what they need let alone 35. So tell me how it is done and done legally please.
You do know that many of these families are on welfare dont you? So that means everyone else pays for that guy to have his 35 kids and 4 wives. Legally you can be married once so the rest are just spiritual wives. They can collect the welfare and keep costing everyone else. So no I dont think its ok. You produce those kids then you pay for them. Plain and simple. Much of your money goes to the church and in Colorado City the church owns most of those houses. How then do you support your 35 children if much of what you make goes to the church? Do you really think those wives and children are all going to get along? I think its more like a huge headaqche 24/7. Doesnt seem worth it to me.