Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: trubluolyguy
I agree, but frankly, I wouldn't be excited about joining a military in which I'm likely to be keep awake at night in the barracks or on the front lines by the sound of two men going at it together or the possibility of having to cope with "gay" "sexual" dynamics on the battlefield.

Such a ruling very well could threaten national security in the sense that no one will want to join the military 'cept gays - and what kind of a military would that be? What country would fear the might of the American fags?

Just my 2 cents...

53 posted on 05/03/2006 5:29:53 PM PDT by the anti-liberal (OUR schools are damaging OUR children)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]


To: the anti-liberal

I agree, but frankly, I wouldn't be excited about joining a military in which I'm likely to be keep awake at night in the barracks or on the front lines by the sound of two men going at it together or the possibility of having to cope with "gay" "sexual" dynamics on the battlefield


They have that now with "Don't ask, don't tell." I can't tell what this vaccuous woman is trying to do other than stir a pot. I think the sodomy rule is dumb, I mean are they going to have the sex police in military housing? Hint, it's not just gay men that do that particular act.

As far as it being a threat to Nat'l security....if someone is concerned about this being a threat to nat'l security they really ought to look at the Mexican border.


57 posted on 05/03/2006 6:30:46 PM PDT by trubluolyguy (It wasn't the spikes that kept Him on the cross.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson