Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TXBSAFH

"Not voting beats suppoting rino everytime."

I don't think it does, although I used to. I voted for Arnold here in California, although he is quite too liberal for me. He is hundreds of thousands of times better than having Gray Davis in, tho, and those were the choices. I don't think being a purist works. Well, I think it is a Pyrrhic victory. You win, you stay pure, you lose int he end.


32 posted on 04/09/2006 2:08:42 PM PDT by bboop (Stealth Tutor)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: bboop

I will no longer vote for who can win, for now on I will only vote for who should win. Rinos are as badas rats.


35 posted on 04/09/2006 2:12:39 PM PDT by TXBSAFH (Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: bboop
He is hundreds of thousands of times better than having Gray Davis in, tho, and those were the choices.

Here's something to think about: liberal policies, when seen in their undiluted form, are so bad that people wake up and come back to truly conservative ideals before enough time passes to irrepairably damage the country. Jimmy Carter's four years were an example. On the other hand, quasi-liberal policies fail slowly until a couple of decades down the line the nation is lost and it's people ask themselves, "how in the world did we get here?"

It's important to vote in a way that is right for America, not in one that is "less wrong."
62 posted on 04/13/2006 11:51:56 AM PDT by Old_Mil (http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson