To: TXBSAFH
"Not voting beats suppoting rino everytime."
I don't think it does, although I used to. I voted for Arnold here in California, although he is quite too liberal for me. He is hundreds of thousands of times better than having Gray Davis in, tho, and those were the choices. I don't think being a purist works. Well, I think it is a Pyrrhic victory. You win, you stay pure, you lose int he end.
32 posted on
04/09/2006 2:08:42 PM PDT by
bboop
(Stealth Tutor)
To: bboop
I will no longer vote for who can win, for now on I will only vote for who should win. Rinos are as badas rats.
35 posted on
04/09/2006 2:12:39 PM PDT by
TXBSAFH
(Proud Dad of Twins, What Does Not Kill You Makes You Stronger!!!!!!)
To: bboop
He is hundreds of thousands of times better than having Gray Davis in, tho, and those were the choices.
Here's something to think about: liberal policies, when seen in their undiluted form, are so bad that people wake up and come back to truly conservative ideals before enough time passes to irrepairably damage the country. Jimmy Carter's four years were an example. On the other hand, quasi-liberal policies fail slowly until a couple of decades down the line the nation is lost and it's people ask themselves, "how in the world did we get here?"
It's important to vote in a way that is right for America, not in one that is "less wrong."
62 posted on
04/13/2006 11:51:56 AM PDT by
Old_Mil
(http://www.constitutionparty.org - Forging a Rebirth of Freedom.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson