Posted on 03/25/2006 8:57:39 PM PST by woodb01
They are both really just pathetic, each in a different way, imo.
There is a way of thinking about men and women in which they are comprised of seperate 'centers' of intelligence - the three primary centers are the 'instinctive' or 'sensing' intelligence; the 'emotive' or 'feeling' intelligence; and the 'intellective' or 'thinking' intelligence. These develop over the course of childhood. Puberty begins the development of a fourth 'center' called the sex center, which posesses its own intelligence, that is, way of thinking.
Our society focuses on the development of the 'thinking center' and ignores the development of the 'feeling center' so that people are brought up to be emotional idiots.
Liberal Socialists, especially those who raise their children (when they have children) 'gender neutral', are not only ignoring the emotive development of their children (when they have children), but they are, in many cases, intentionally instilling them with emotive pathologies. When these unfortunate children reach puberty their 'sex center' develops in a pathological or stunted fashion, with either an abnormal fixation in the stage of development (the child never fully develops that center of intelligence) or with abnormal distortions.
Because children are being raised poorly from birth to adolescence and beyond we are seeing an increase in the abnormal development of increasingly more and more young adults.
IMO.
I think you're way off base on who you think your opponents are here.
Cheney's daughter is who you are really up against. Not her specifically, but Americans who were raised like she was and are still gay, yet not vocal. She has not stepped for in favor of gay marriage, but it's the children of her generation from families such as hers who will be the turning point of gay marriage. Not the borderline crazy liberals with androgynous children.
I understand the problem in the way it is commonly viewed, don't get me wrong - I know all of the popular, common and widespread rhetoric, and I don't disagree with it.
I'm just looking a little deeper, pursuing the underlying cause.
People are complex machines and there's usually something that has occured in the development of that machinery that give rise to the many kinds of pathological behavior people exhibit.
When I said people are brought up to be emotional idiots, I wasn't just talking about Liberal Socialists, I was talking about everybody - including Cheney's daughter and others like her.
In my opinion, the best and perhaps only long term solution is to focus on insuring the healthy development of the succeeding generations of young people, either through a homeschooling system or by correcting the rampant pathologies infecting our socialist school system, which inevitably infect the students.
Children who are brought up emotionally healthy and who are well connected and trust their instinctive and emotive intelligences will naturally feel the wrongness of 'queerness' and will develop in a more natural fashion.
Homophobe is an OXYMORON, like "Jumbo Shrimp"
Fear of Homosapiens? The fact is, this perversion has even perverted the basic and plain meaning of words!
There is no such thing as "homophobia," it's a cute marketing con...
I think you are 100% correct about this. I think most homos and lesies had domineering mothers and milktoast or absent fathers. Guess what? Serial killers seem to come from similar backgrounds. Although there is no guarantee about anything, nothing seems to produce well-balanced adults than coming from an intact family having a father and a mother. Shouldn't be any surprise, that seems an arrangement both natural and logical.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.