OK, fess up. What did you do?
:O)
No reason the images would be any less admissable than other images of like quality, in line with any rules set by the court of jurisdiction.
Chain of custody could be a problem.
Main problem will be with image quality.
http://www.phillyburbs.com/pb-dyn/news/7-03192004-267058.html ATLANTA - When Lisa Johnson saw a man exposing himself to her in a parking lot, she reached for her cell phone - not to call 911, but to snap a picture. The images captured on her camera phone led police to the capture of the former principal of a nearby high school. After his arrest on public indecency charges last month, he resigned from a lower school job. Cell phones that can take pictures are becoming a more common way for victims and other witnesses to help police capture criminals. Because the phones are so portable and always on, it takes only a moment to photograph the face or license plate of someone in the act of a crime. "I guess I was just quick on my toes," said Johnson, who lives in Alpharetta, about 20 miles north of Atlanta. "I had my hand in my pocket, and rather than hit him and break my phone, I remembered there was a camera." Camera phones are still a relatively new technology, but already police can point to cases where they have been an important tool. In New Jersey last year, a 15-year-old boy foiled an abduction attempt when he took pictures of a man trying to lure him into a car. In Pittsburgh last month, several visiting St. John's University basketball players were cleared of a rape accusation after one team member gave investigators his cell phone, which he had used to videotape some of the encounter. In Japan, an 18-year-old woman took a photo of a 38-year-old man who was fondling her on a commuter train, and police arrested him at the next stop. In Sweden, a convenience store owner took a picture of a robber that was used to help identify and arrest the criminal.