Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: bjs1779; T'wit

I'm siding with T'wit on this one. Michael asked the court's permission because it wasn't legal to do it when he first sought to remove it. Until then, the court was not involved. Michael is the one who initiated the legal proceedings. At least this is how I look at it.


180 posted on 03/13/2006 8:45:56 PM PST by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies ]


To: Ohioan from Florida
Thank you, that rings a bell or two.

It'll have to do for tonight, anyway, cuz I gotta go. Cheers, all.

181 posted on 03/13/2006 9:19:52 PM PST by T'wit (C'est une folie a nulle autre seconde, / De vouloir se meler a corriger le monde. -- Moliere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

To: Ohioan from Florida
I'm siding with T'wit on this one. Michael asked the court's permission because it wasn't legal to do it when he first sought to remove it. Until then, the court was not involved. Michael is the one who initiated the legal proceedings. At least this is how I look at it.

I guess we are just discussing a technicality over the word 'lawsuit'. What would the correct term be in this case, Petition the Court? If lawsuit means to sue someone, who did he sue, initially?

186 posted on 03/14/2006 11:44:41 AM PST by bjs1779
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson