Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: RockinRight

I doubt that would suffice. Procreative sex looks so much like recreational sex that it would be hard to distinguish. Perhaps if the participants had grim, purposeful looks on their faces during the act, it would help?


195 posted on 03/06/2006 9:29:59 AM PST by linda_22003
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 184 | View Replies ]


To: linda_22003
I'm sure you're right. Of course, I think that FreedomSplurge is also one of those types that thinks enjoying sex is immoral...so the "purposeful looks" might help ease his conscience.
201 posted on 03/06/2006 9:34:11 AM PST by RockinRight (Attention RNC...we're the party of Reagan, not FDR...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

To: linda_22003

"Perhaps if the participants had grim, purposeful looks on their faces during the act, it would help?
"

Another sure clue that the sex is recreational is if the people are naked. So, you need to take that photo while having sex fully clothed, with only sufficient clothing removed to allow for the act.

Once per month is all that's allowed, at the woman's most fertile time. Then, after having sex, you'll be unclean for several days, have to perform ritual cleansing procedures and stay away from the altar until the unclean period has passed.

The bottom line is that it's easier just to have a child as soon as possible, so you can vote. I suggest that would-be voters begin having intercourse in earnest about age 16, so they can vote as soon as they are 18.

Yeah...that's the ticket.


203 posted on 03/06/2006 9:35:14 AM PST by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 195 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson