On the contrary, it's a critical component of the driving force behind evolution, to wit, to try to explain the universe absent a Primary Mover.
The other comment wasn't intended as an ad hominem, though I can see how it could be interpreted as such. It was merely an observation.
Nothing I am writing is out of malice. Consider the following: you're in your doctor's office recieving the results of a test against a large hilar mass in your left lung. As a smoker for 40 years, you fear the worst.
The doctor comes in with a grave countenance. "It's a small-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma. These tumors are non- resectable. Here are your options."
"What's the prognosis?" "Without treatment, four months, tops." This is a very serious moment in your life; the doctor does not divulge that this particular cancer has one of the shortest and most aggressive clinical course of all cancers.
Evolution is an aggresive carcinoma that will claim the souls of any who apply it consistently. Smugly confident in their "evidence" (again, interpreted in such a way as to support the a prioiri theory), they choose a lie over the truth in the Word of God.
You will say to me, "Evolution says nothing about God." There are those who try to combine the two, it is true. But in its purest form, evolution is the foundation of atheism, and the latter will consume your soul.