HAHA! Wasn't Lurch in that one?
Posted on 02/06/2006 1:39:00 PM PST by ichabod_65
Hey, if we can take care of it now, our grandkids won't have to.
Seemed like a slap in the face of Catholicism when a pontiff would dare kiss the unholy koran.
John Paul knew full well that this was no mere courtesy, but an affont to all Christians to kow-tow to evil islam.
I am a Catholic. Therefore I am capable of thought and recognize sacrilege when I see it regardless of who is committing the act.
It was dead wrong.
In 100 years, North and South America will be primarily Catholic, as the population of North American becomes increasingly Hispanic. Europe will become Islamic. Africa will be divided between Islam in the North and Christianity in the south. Asia will be up for grabs, although I expect Christianity to make significant inroads into China.
In practical terms?
Not a damned thing.
It's a COOKBOOK!
Can't argue with ya there, Bannie.
For the Constitutional purists, Mohammedanism can simply be considered as a treasonous organization. At the very least, Mohammedan immigration should be halted.
I got banned for saying that in the weeks following 9/11. Times change 8-)
HAHA! Wasn't Lurch in that one?
|
|
|
At what point then is the approach of danger to be expected? I answer, if it ever reach us, it must spring up amongst us. It cannot come from abroad. If destruction were our lot, we must ourselves be its author and finisher. As a nation of freemen, we must live through all time, or die by suicide."
-Abraham Lincoln
Not on my watch!
It won't happen because after the next attack on U.S. soil, the mosques in the U.S. won't be very well attended.
When reading the Hadith, the words of Muhammed, you'll find different events of Prophet Muhammed' s life in which, when he had problems, Allah solved them right away.
For example, he was sexually aroused by seeing his daughter-in-law, so Allah sent him a message saying he could marry her because his son was adopted and not a real son, so the marriage was therefore justified. Further, he created a new rule, that Muslims would not be allowed to adopt any children.
Muhammed married thirteen times, one of his brides being six-year-old Ayesha.
Allah, he said, told him that he was only allowed to enjoy captive women, and he put Ayesha in a veil because he was jealous and did not want his friends looking admiringly at her when they went to his house. Allah, he said, told his friends they could go to the Prophet' s house any time they wanted but if they went they should not look at any of his wives or ask any of them for anything. He was so jealous of his wives that he introduced the veil for his wives and, ultimately, for all Muslim women.
Even though widow-marriage was legal, he made it illegal for men to marry any of his own wives when he himself died.
It becomes clear that Muhammed had written the Qur'an for his own interest, for his own comfort, for his own fun. So why all the mooselimbs?
I know.
Few can read and the ones that can are extremely gullible or want to live like Muhammed and go to muslim heaven. If we lived like that we know we'd go to hell.
"Mosque clerics will be regarded the same as the Methodist minister down the street. After all, a cleric is a cleric.
I stopped reading this bull puckey after the second sentence above....I suppose Mr. Author doesn't know much about how mohammedan 'clerics' have a problem with preaching peace."
Well the Methodists seem to be taking the Palestenians side aganst Israel, maybe they are hoping the Mooselimbs will be nice nice to them.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
