A nobody with a plan that can restore the Constitution if people recognize the value of the ideas. It is not the who that matters, it is the what. It is curious to me that anyone wants to know about the author when they can know the plan. Why would anyone want to trust somebody when they can simply trust their own judgment about the content of the ideas.
If the goal, restoration of the Constitution, fits your goals and ambitions, who cares who was the first to say let's see if we can restore the Constitution. If the plan that finally evolves from this effort seems sound to you, who cares who put forward the first draft, even if it becomes the working draft. If the goal fits, and the plan seems reasonable, what matters in the big picture is whether the execution is successful. And what should matter to you, is whether you were part of it or standing on the sidelines. Were you pushing the plan forward and executing it or were you part of the problem>
"It is not the who that matters, it is the what. It is curious to me that anyone wants to know about the author when they can know the plan."
Because some would want to know if if the author has the gravitas and the game to see this through. How do we know you are not a convicted felon?
Words are cheap and "ideas" about how to restore the constitution are a dime a dozen. It's not the plan, it's the planners.
What you are asking is akin to asking someone to make a bet on the Superbowl without telling them who the teams are.
Every Superbowl team has a game plan but I want to know who the quarterback will be.