I think there is ample peer-review concerning reality concepts and observational aspects surrounding quantam field theory and it can throw in to question the validity of empiricism. That can come across as heresy, with the oh-so-predictable "you must be a creationist."
I think the degree to which we think we have knowledge is not too palatable.
I think there is ample peer-review concerning reality concepts and observational aspects surrounding quantam field theory and it can throw in to question the validity of empiricism. That can come across as heresy, with the oh-so-predictable "you must be a creationist."
I think the degree to which we think we have knowledge is not too palatable.
I simply asked a couple of simple questions. You seem to have come across articles in peer-reviewed journals, so that sounds like science.
(I have not reviewed anything in this field, so have no idea of the accuracy of the claims; I am a simple bone man.)