Just still have questions relating to mostly physics that leave open the metaphyical. Will these courses be on the hit list too some day?
To: Dimensio; b_sharp; atlaw; Senator Bedfellow; CarolinaGuitarman; Rudder; Ditto; Ignatz; ...
*Ontological in search for truth *ping*
2 posted on
01/15/2006 6:14:40 PM PST by
101st-Eagle
(An appeaser is one who feeds his friends to a crocodile hoping to get eaten last-Winston Churchill)
To: 101st-Eagle
Just so you know, despite having actual advanced physics degrees from real universities, Sarfatti is one of the more famous cranks from USEnet. He's basically gone "off the reservation" like Richard Hoagland.
To: 101st-Eagle
Just still have questions relating to mostly physics that leave open the metaphyical. Will these courses be on the hit list too some day? Is it science or religion?
Are the articles appearing in peer-reviewed scientific journals or in creationist pamphlets and websites?
Answer these two questions and you may have discovered the answer to your question.
4 posted on
01/15/2006 6:16:16 PM PST by
Coyoteman
(I love the sound of beta decay in the morning!)
To: 101st-Eagle
Was Bell's Theorem proven?
5 posted on
01/15/2006 6:21:26 PM PST by
Hoosier-Daddy
(It's a fight to the death with Democrats.)
To: 101st-Eagle
Indeed, the quantum force violates Newton's idea that for every action there must be a reaction. This is the key idea of Bohm's theory which cannot even be formulated in Bohr's theory.Are there data supporting this assertion?
6 posted on
01/15/2006 6:56:18 PM PST by
Rudder
To: 101st-Eagle
Einstein believed in God, didn't he?
15 posted on
01/15/2006 8:14:52 PM PST by
No Longer Free State
(No event has just one cause, no person has just one motive, no action has just the intended effect)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson