Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: kerryusama04
But don't our guys carry more rounds if they are equipped with a 223?

Yes they do. And the .223 is a very effective round in open desert, but most of that type fighting has long since passed. Reports I am getting are that in urban combat the .223 is insufficiant in mass to penetrate (and kill the bad guy on the other side) cover such as cinderblock walls.

Another problem is that our weapons tend to dislike sand and dirt. The AK is famous for working after dumpin a bucket of sand thru it. On the other hand our weapons are far more precice for targeting.

One fellow I know just reported that 4 insurgents unloaded thier AKs on them and missed them all.

They killed all 4

44 posted on 01/11/2006 8:11:39 PM PST by mylife (The roar of the masses could be farts)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: mylife
I was refering to the weight argument. They need more rounds if they are using such a light round. Same goes for the 9mm.

The "lets wound them and stress their resources" argument is gone with our current enemy as well.

I am guessing it's a treaty or something, but why don't we use hollow or soft points? Light, fast, FMJ might be good for venison...

47 posted on 01/11/2006 8:20:01 PM PST by kerryusama04 (The Bill of Rights is not occupation specific.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

To: mylife
I love your Tagline, the quotes on your Homepage

TT
64 posted on 01/11/2006 9:16:56 PM PST by TexasTransplant (NEMO ME IMPUNE LACESSET)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson