Hillary Treasurer Grossman Admits Filing False FEC Reports Hiding Paul's $1.2 Million Contribution

Peter Paul ^ | 1-4-06 | Peter Paul

[doug from upland]

Hillary Clinton, temporarily, remains above the law. Andrew Grossman should have been charged with Rosen and Hillary. Are the Republicans just going to take the onslaught by the Democrats, or will the Justice Department actually finally be told by the Attorney General to do something about this. Grossman must be charged. INDICTING HILLARY is becoming even more important if the truth is ever going to be revealed for all to see.

[litehaus]

Can we get the Barrett report now to 'top this off?'

[aviator]

NO ONE should be above the law.

[yellowdoghunter]

If this was a Republican Treasurer, you can bet it would be screamed from the mountain tops. But alas, that is not the case and will probably not even make the nightly news.

[doug from upland]

Ping

[upchuck]

Thank you for the update.

If this trial proceeds as it should and if we can get the Barrett report released, we may, FINALLY, be rid of The Hildabeaste and, maybe, her raping partner in crime.

[doug from upland]

Please put other examples on this thread of other FEC findings and fines. $35K is an insult. This was the biggest campaign finance fraud ever.

[Zack Nguyen]

bump to the top.

[nuconvert]

"wil challenge Hillary and Bill to tell the truth in their own depositions"

Lol. It's always a challenge for them to tell the truth.
Being under oath just means they have to work harder to prevent the truth from coming out.

[b4its2late]

He's the new Web Hubbell? Wonder how many times he'll have to rollover for her?

[b4its2late]

what does everyone think of the "Clinton Body Count?"

DOWNSIDE LEGACY AT TWO DEGREES OF PRESIDENT CLINTON ~ Thanks Alamo Girl!

[Congressman Billybob]

David Shippers agreed with your conclusion. He said, "the Clintons are indictable, but not convictable." What he meant was that no matter how clear the evidence and the law, it is a near certainty that any possible jury would contain at least one Clinton Kool-Aid drinker who would never vote to convict.

So, as you say, the necessity is to slime Lady Macbeth so thoroughly that, like Teddy Kennedy in Massachusetts, she might continue to infest the Senate from her "home" state, but will never again be seriously considered for President. That's the goal, and today's news is a big step in that direction.

Congressman Billybob

Latest column: "Hyenas, Jackals, and Monsters with Microphones"

[doug from upland]

Pretty incredible decision, huh, John?

[doug from upland]

If any of you missed an important part of this entire saga, story, here is a brief summary.

Peter Paul filed his civil lawsuit in June of 2001. On July 3, 2001, Grossman was served. Included were bank statements, invoices, and cancelled checks documenting $1.6 million in money spent by Peter. On July11, 2001, lying, spinning weasel David Kendall accepted service for Hillary. He received the same documentation. Nevertheless, the candidate conspired with her treasurer and allowed him to file a 3rd fraudulent return on July 30, 2001. Hillary knew everything.

[b4its2late]

Welcome to FR BTW..... No pop ups here for sure... LOL!

[b4its2late]

Can we get the Barrett report now to 'top this off?'

I wish!!!!!!

[yoe]

Hillary must now be compelled to explain why, (e.m.) as a candidate who was notified that false reports had been filed by her campaign relating to the largest contribution to her campaign and the identity of her largest donor, she refused to cause the false reports to be amended or footnoted, and why she allowed yet a third false report to be filed by Grossman weeks after she received various sworn pleadings and statements accompanied by checks and invoices.

Does anyone expect Ms. clinton to reply truthfully about this? Keep the facts handy as the woman (?) will deny any involvement - 'ya know......................