Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Sam Hill
I'm not necessarily saying what I think. I am saying what I believe Calame and the NYT think. Calame is obviously disappointed that they didn't use this to help their side win the elections.

There was a time when I would have thought this was terribly cynical, but no more.

I find myself suspecting all connected with the big media, and I think the day will come when we need someone we can trust to disemminate information, and because they have no credibility, people will die.

I have no doubt that people have already died because of the traitors who leak secrets as if they belonged to them.

31 posted on 01/03/2006 4:33:13 PM PST by lawnguy (Give me some of your tots!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]


To: lawnguy

The Times is very proud of their attempts to throw Presidential elections for one party or another. And they have been doing this since right after the Civil War, if not even earlier.

This is from their "Time Line":

1876
Disgusted with the scandals in the Grant Administration, George Jones, now the publisher, moves The Times away from the Republican Party.

New York Times Company: Our Company: Timeline: NY Times Timeline 1851-1880
http://www.nytco.com/company-timeline-1851.html


32 posted on 01/03/2006 6:15:00 PM PST by Sam Hill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson