1 posted on
12/18/2005 2:03:06 PM PST by
Coleus
To: 2ndMostConservativeBrdMember; afraidfortherepublic; Alas; al_c; american colleen; annalex; ...
2 posted on
12/18/2005 2:03:56 PM PST by
Coleus
(Roe v. Wade and Endangered Species Act both passed in 1973, Murder Babies/save trees, birds, algae)
To: PatrickHenry; Junior
3 posted on
12/18/2005 2:05:18 PM PST by
dread78645
(Sorry Mr. Franklin, We couldn't keep it.)
To: Coleus
LOL, this will endear Pat to the "list".
4 posted on
12/18/2005 2:07:47 PM PST by
jwalsh07
To: Coleus
PIG to Science is a great book.
Very well done as usual for Bethell.
5 posted on
12/18/2005 2:16:27 PM PST by
tallhappy
(Juntos Podemos!)
To: Coleus
If believing that Christ raised people from the dead is a matter of faith -- and it is -- is not the Darwinist claim that nature created life out of non-life a matter of faith? If it is science, why can't scientists replicate it in microcosm in a laboratory? There you have it. Evolutionists say their theory is science, while creation is religion because it's based on faith. As Pat points out, evolution comes down to faith as well, so it is no less a religious belief than creation. This is why ID and creation have as much right to be taught as theories in the classroom as does evolution.
7 posted on
12/18/2005 3:17:08 PM PST by
GLDNGUN
To: Coleus
Good article on one of the links that you provided, via your first post:
Evolution: Science or Atheism in Disguise?
http://www.cbn.com/cbnnews/news/050517d.asp
The title tells it all. With all of the new findings, evolution is surely atheism in disguise.
27 posted on
12/18/2005 11:52:45 PM PST by
Sun
(Hillary Clinton is pro-ILLEGAL immigration. Don't let her fool you. She has a D- /F immigr. rating.)
To: Coleus
Go Pat go!
Word is getting out that the emperor has no clothes.
29 posted on
12/19/2005 4:50:14 AM PST by
Aquinasfan
(Isaiah 22:22, Rev 3:7, Mat 16:19)
To: Coleus
is not the Darwinist claim that nature created life out of non-life a matter of faith?
The theory of evolution makes no claims regarding "life out of non-life". The author of the article is either woefully ignorant on the subject of evolution, and nothing that he says on the subject can be trusted, or he is lying about evolution, and thus nothing that he says on the subject can be trusted.
30 posted on
12/19/2005 8:02:16 AM PST by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
To: Coleus
Chris Mooney's review of Bethell's book is first rate. I especially like the original sub-title of Bethell's book, which they changed at the last minute.
"Liberals have hijacked science for long enough. Now it's our turn."
BWAHAHAHA!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson