Yes but first allow me to correct you on two points. Drugs were found at Maye's residence and an oath and affirmation was submitted to justify the search warrant.
Okay now back to how Maye should have positioned himself. Face down and spread eagle.
Pure unsubstantiated hearsay, with zero accountability whatsoever.
If Officer Jones presented an affidavit and it were later shown that the affiant was lying, that person could be charged with perjury.
But if all that exists is Officer Jones claiming that someone told him something, there's no way any particular person could be proven to have been lying even if the allegations were fabricated out of whole cloth.
I know there are judges who will rubber-stamp warrants on the basis of garbage like that, but there are also judges who proclaim a lot of things that are clearly wrong.
Okay now back to how Maye should have positioned himself. Face down and spread eagle.
That would have been an effective means of protecting his child if the intruder had meant her harm?