In the exchange on the front page of the source blog- the prosecutor from the case, who is in communication with the blogger- appears to have indicated that there were warrants for both dwellings in the duplex- but that Maye was not specifically named.
The blog has been updated today, BTW- for anybody who wants to hear more of the story.
It also indicates that the warrants were apparently issued on the basis of anonymous hearsay (supposedly the decedent knew who the informant was, but didn't tell anyone). Not sure how that squares with the "oath or affirmation" requirement, or even with anything even remotely resembling sensible procedure.
If the warrants were facially valid, and the other cops on the raid didn't know about their dubious nature, those other cops should probably not be prosecuted for capital murder. If there was no record whatsoever of the supposed informant, however, the judge who issued the warrants should be so prosecuted [though I know he'll claim immunity or somesuch nonsense].