Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: TChris; rdb3
I am on the other side of this debate. I use Xemacs. :-)

Emacs/Xemacs are a bit "different" for someone coming from a DOS background. But, it is more similar in a way as it is, unlike vi, "modeless." Xemacs is, as it's name implies, geared towards X11 use, but when invoked via 'xemacs -nw' will work in text mode just like regular emacs (which also defaults to X mode these days).

On the other hand, there is nano (widely available) or pico (part of the PINE project), which are pretty similar to your basic DOS text editor.

There are so many Unix/Linux editors out there, I'm sure you can find one that you will like.

6 posted on 11/10/2005 3:13:24 PM PST by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: B Knotts
Dang, and I was really looking forward to a good vi/emacs holy war ;)

In the absence of that, I'll second your suggestion of pico.

7 posted on 11/10/2005 3:15:16 PM PST by Senator Bedfellow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson