Seeing as how the thread begins with a nasty unsubstantiated ad hominem directed at the President, your post is laughable.
I am responding to the slander of the President by pointing out exactly who his self-righteous accuser is and what circle he moves in.
I admit that I find it amusing that someone with your screenname is leaping to the defense of these slimy Israel-haters.
When you use words like "ad hominem" without knowing what they mean, you make yourself look dumb. The article argues why Bush's word shouldn't be taken at face value; there's nothing ad hominem about that. Answer the arguments.
I admit that I find it amusing that someone with your screenname is leaping to the defense of these slimy Israel-haters.
That's a textbook example of ad hominem attack, for example.