Skip to comments.
The Bush Betrayal
Magic City Morning Star ^
| Oct 12, 2005, 11:41
| Nicholas Stix
Posted on 10/12/2005 1:53:31 PM PDT by Constitution Restoration Act
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
To: wideawake
"But this talk of the President as an enemy of the Constitution is cheap, lousy character assassination of the most Michael Mooresque description." On that, we agree.
21
posted on
10/12/2005 2:16:51 PM PDT
by
indcons
(Let the Arabs take care of their jihadi brothers this time around (re: Paki earthquake))
To: dirtboy
Well said. We may all be at fault. However, the pro-Miers crowd uses names like DUmmie, etc. because others disagree with the president's crony choice. That said, the speculation about Miers being a lesbian and similar "below the belt" attacks are unacceptable as well.
22
posted on
10/12/2005 2:19:03 PM PDT
by
indcons
(Let the Arabs take care of their jihadi brothers this time around (re: Paki earthquake))
To: Constitution Restoration Act
Seminar poster or Uber-Con, you decide.
To: indcons
I wish more dissenters on your side had your insight and class. This is how Freepers should think. Character assassination of our President is intolerable when done by those we have fought next to (brother and sister Conservatives), for so long. I expect it out of jerks like carville and begala... not fellow Conservatives.
Thank you for your statement.
LLS
24
posted on
10/12/2005 2:22:26 PM PDT
by
LibLieSlayer
(Preserve America... kill terrorists... destroy dims!)
To: wideawake
Okay. For whatever reason, mrustow was stuck on this guy. That's how I remembered the name (although the name Nicholas Stix is very close to Nikki Sixx from Motley Crue).
If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.
They're going fast!
25
posted on
10/12/2005 2:24:22 PM PDT
by
rdb3
(Have you ever stopped to think, but forgot to start again?)
To: LibLieSlayer
You're welcome, LLS. I appreciate your kind comments. There is always a place for civilized debate. Sometimes, emotions tend to run high (and I've been guilty of the same as well).
26
posted on
10/12/2005 2:26:38 PM PDT
by
indcons
(Let the Arabs take care of their jihadi brothers this time around (re: Paki earthquake))
To: Constitution Restoration Act
This whole debate is getting silly now. P*ssed at GWB? Dont vote for him!
27
posted on
10/12/2005 2:27:20 PM PDT
by
cardinal4
(No more catchy taglines-The Left just plain sucks...)
To: indcons
There is always a place for civilized debate.Around here? :)
28
posted on
10/12/2005 2:29:13 PM PDT
by
Mike Bates
(Irish Alzheimer's victim: I only remember the grudges.)
To: dirtboy
I think much of the "outrage" is just trolling for dissent. We have a Senate that goes along to get along, we have the cowardly cabal of RINOs.
I think those who are "outraged" are just jockeying for position for the next presidential race.
To: wideawake
Stix and his buddies have one goal - to destroy the conservative movement with their carping since they cannot gain control of it.I see your ad-hominem gun is locked and loaded, and your powder's all wet.
30
posted on
10/12/2005 3:05:13 PM PDT
by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
To: dirtboy
He instead says she is an originalist - which means he says that she will faithfully interpret the Constitution.The article happens to answer that point very well: the one thing we know for darn sure is that Bush is no originalist. He said she's an originalist... and he also said she shares his views. Both of those statements can't be true at the same time.
31
posted on
10/12/2005 3:07:42 PM PDT
by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
To: dirtboy
If you want a return to a civil debate, you should apologize for your role in enflaming the debate and set an example.
To: Shalom Israel
I see your ad-hominem gun is locked and loaded, and your powder's all wet.Seeing as how the thread begins with a nasty unsubstantiated ad hominem directed at the President, your post is laughable.
I am responding to the slander of the President by pointing out exactly who his self-righteous accuser is and what circle he moves in.
I admit that I find it amusing that someone with your screenname is leaping to the defense of these slimy Israel-haters.
33
posted on
10/12/2005 6:03:25 PM PDT
by
wideawake
(God bless our brave troops and their Commander-in-Chief)
To: wideawake
Seeing as how the thread begins with a nasty unsubstantiated ad hominem directed at the President, your post is laughable.When you use words like "ad hominem" without knowing what they mean, you make yourself look dumb. The article argues why Bush's word shouldn't be taken at face value; there's nothing ad hominem about that. Answer the arguments.
I admit that I find it amusing that someone with your screenname is leaping to the defense of these slimy Israel-haters.
That's a textbook example of ad hominem attack, for example.
34
posted on
10/13/2005 3:14:03 AM PDT
by
Shalom Israel
(Pray for the peace of Jerusalem.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-34 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson