Popular vote? If strict Constitutionalists such as Scalia and Thomas read your post, they'd laugh at you. Nowhere in the Constitution does the popular vote have any meaning in Presidential elections.
no, they don't, but their votes kept the liberals from harping on the "he never won the popular vote" train.
Plus, even though they can't deliver their states, the blue states deliver a hell of a lot of money to the presidential campaign for republicans.
To insult them like this is idiotic.
I was just using the imbecilic reasoning of the man who posted that utterly moronic piece.
After all, where the hell in the Constitution does it say that we have to be silent if we disagree with a decision made by the president?