Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Deo et Patria
A former insider who worked on the Senate committee that vetted nominees told me this:

On a scale of 1 to 10 Miers is a "2".

Miers in Bush's Homer Thornberry - who is that? - the SCOTUS nominee from Texas who LBJ tried to appoint on his way out of office. Old crony and US Rep who replaced him.

Lack of will for a fight caused this result.
16 posted on 10/10/2005 11:03:21 AM PDT by Benkei (War, I love the smell of frying Democrats in the morning)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Benkei

I have a tough time buying this, and here's why:

1) The president and his advisers KNOW that the judiciary is a hot button issue that could cost them their electoral majority. If they drop the ball on this (because of a supposed fear of fighting with libs), they tarnish everything that they've done, and Bush will be judged to have broken his word.

2)The president, to his credit, has NEVER been someone to back away from a fight. Also, he personally knows the stakes of an activist judiciary (see Bush v. Gore) and is committed to reforming it. I think that he believes that Miers is a predictable vote that he can count on for years, and who can be confirmed with a minimum amount of effort.


17 posted on 10/10/2005 11:32:42 AM PDT by Deo et Patria (Dulce et decorum est pro patria mori.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson