Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: papertyger
Doesn't Civil Rights and anti-discrimination precedents play merry hell with your unrestricted conception of the employers property rights?

Yes. Such precedents are both morally wrong and Unconstitutional. Let's not make the situation even worse by adding yet more wrongful precedents, just because we favor the Second Ammendment and an armed society. Using the power of government to enforce false rights is what the left is all about. Such false rights lead to logical contradictions that ultimately destroy the moral fabric of society.

16 posted on 10/09/2005 12:06:02 AM PDT by sourcery (Givernment: The way the average voter spells "government.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: sourcery

I'm sorry. I just can't agree with your POV. And my views on the Second Amendment have little to do with it.

Engaging in commerce is an activity that is subject to regulation by the Constitution, even though ones private property may be used in such activity.

The two should not be conflated.


17 posted on 10/09/2005 1:56:54 AM PDT by papertyger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson