To: Lando Lincoln
I am not not yet "happy" with this nominee, but then again I DID elect him primarily to make this "pick", all by himself,using his own judgment, as POTUS.
I am not quite ready to claim "buyers remorse", but I reserve my right to do so, without furthor notice, at any time!
I am concerned that many knowledgeable individuals, talking heads, and FReepers, whose opinions I highly value on this subject, are "not happy".
I am willing to wait a bit before I vent my own "considered opinion" rant, since it is unusual to see so much internal discord among those who claim to have the same goals.
It is an interesting and slightly disturbing thing to observe.
BTW, off topic, I assume everyone is following the official "MSM non-event" of the suicide bomber outside the OU stadium last Saturday?
41 posted on
10/04/2005 5:26:42 PM PDT by
sarasmom
(What is the legal daily bag limit for RINOs in the USA?)
To: sarasmom
I think many of the objectors were just looking for a fight over an "in your face" nominee. (Ann Coulter is upset she didn't go to a more prestigious law school)
From what I have seen from Bush, the in your facer will be the one to replace a Lib (I know Elvis is dead, but a couple of those justices aren't looking so good these days) and he may just get that chance.
42 posted on
10/04/2005 5:43:47 PM PDT by
gov_bean_ counter
(Bush to Blanco to "tighten up", so she called her plastic surgeon)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson