To: Always Right; Howlin; Buckhead
Since the documents were copies, not originals, he could not offer the 100 percent assurance that came by testing the ink or the paper.
Or even a 10 percent assurance for that matter. It's OK. It still would not have proved anything: Even if they'ed have produced the original documents, we would have only discovered they could have been printed on "any" of Bush's 1972 ANG LaserJet printer in the oddffice.
315 posted on
10/08/2005 9:19:36 PM PDT by
Robert A Cook PE
(-I contribute to FR monthly, but ABBCNNBCBS supports Hillary's Secular Sexual Socialism every day.)
To: brf1
Welcome aboard, PINGEE #741.
316 posted on
10/09/2005 1:18:45 PM PDT by
PJ-Comix
(Join the DUmmie FUnnies PING List for the FUNNIEST Blog on the Web)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson