Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: misterrob
Under that logic then why not just continue to water down the party with moderates and big government spender?

Gosh, I can choose between a big-tent party which controls both houses of congress, or a True Conservative minority which can't pass their legislative initiatives and gets steamrolled by the majority leftists. At least with the latter, I can console myself that my True Conservative candidate beat the RINO in the primary. (rolls eyes)

87 posted on 10/03/2005 9:50:58 AM PDT by malakhi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: malakhi
gets steamrolled by the majority leftists

Actually that's not the case. There are many true conservatives in Congress. Enough to stop any steam rolling and enough to pretty much stop most congressional garbage.

I believe conservatives may be better off just stopping the slide into liberalism/socialism than by helping move it along at a slower than normal pace. Take back the Minority! (sounds funny but it has advantages).

92 posted on 10/03/2005 10:04:20 AM PDT by for-q-clinton (If at first you don't succeed keep on sucking until you do succeed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

To: malakhi

Back in 1994 a flood of Republicans were elected to office with a mandate to stop the Clinton's drive to socialize medicine, raise taxes and ruin the country. They forced Billy BJ to reform welfare, keep government spending in line and we saw some good returns from their efforts.

In today's day and age I can choose between two big spending parties who are out buying votes. One party just looks a little more PC for some people on this board.


94 posted on 10/03/2005 10:20:21 AM PDT by misterrob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 87 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson