Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Until then it sounds like another case of selective morality to me.

If you don't think for a second these "parents" didn't enroll this child for political purposes then you're selectively arrogant. Why exactly would members of the Film Actors Guild enroll "their" kid in a school that will teach that their parents are immoral, because the parents are trying to repent? Not only are they using "their" child for some sick political stunt they're also involving the other children at that school all in the name of justifying their selfish perversion.

88 posted on 09/23/2005 3:27:48 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks (If you don't like Jesus, you can go to hell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]


To: Clint N. Suhks
If you don't think for a second these "parents" didn't enroll this child for political purposes then you're selectively arrogant.

If they had an ulterior motive then why aren't they raising a stink about it and threatening to take it to court? Instead they've accepted the decision of the school and aren't fighting it. Doesn't sound like 'dykes with a cause' to me.

Not only are they using "their" child for some sick political stunt they're also involving the other children at that school all in the name of justifying their selfish perversion.

About the only think being exposed here is the school's hypocritical, selective morality.

96 posted on 09/23/2005 5:29:31 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: Clint N. Suhks

The two s are not fighting the dismissal. Better behavior than I have seen from hetero parents at my kids' school who have been expelled.


104 posted on 09/23/2005 7:13:47 PM PDT by pa mom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Bloggers & Personal
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson