Since evolution stands on literally millions of data points, with numerous successful predictions under its belt, and no significant data/evidence led dissent about its truth within the worldwide scientific community for more than a century then I guess "a Christian's literal interpretation of the Bible" must be false.
You create the dichotomy, and you've got to live with the conclusion that must be drawn.
Almost all of which are really assumptions
...with numerous successful predictions under its belt,
With many well published flaws that debunk evolution ...
and no significant data/evidence led dissent about its truth within the worldwide scientific community for more than a century
Now that's absolutely incorrect! You present these thesis as fact, when the reality is many of evolution's own proponents have decided that the evidence does not support evolution, and that too many assumptions and mathematical errors have been made over time to consider the theory of evolution valid.
Every time a scientist decides evolution is bunk, you in the "darwin community" turn on them, deride them, then pretend they don't exist.
Let me see, who was the prominent scientist who was for evolution until he published an article in June of 2004 that debunked Darwin?
You're free to believe what you like, however false and unproven it is. The facts are, the more science looks at the "new earth" theory, the "old earth" theory gets debunked and the Bible is proven correct.