Posted on 08/25/2005 6:01:04 PM PDT by HeebrewHammer
I bet Cold Fusion technology saves us. The technology is already being reviewed by the Dept. of Energy.
http://www.infinite-energy.com/
I'm not a nanny state lover who wants to tell folks how to spend their $$$, but wanton gluttony just strikes a discord in my "politics".
Good question! On the other hand, an oversupply of "left-wing liberals" should create a seller's market for Rabbi Lapin's daughters (and mine :-).
When you have eight children, you have to drive a 747 or walk. And you can't walk on the Interstate.
ping
Call me crazy - given that the world's population has tripled in 72 years, and is now racing towards 7 billion - having eight kids is ANYTHING but Conservative.
Liberals either have 1 or 2 children or none at all while Conservatives tend to have 3 or more. Rabbi Lapin kept trying until he had a son, which was his last child.
The good news is that a new analysis predicted it will level off around 7 billion. But as a skeptic, one single study doesn't impress me. (Sorry, can't recall where I read this...)
Spoken like a "morally" superior liberal.
Think about that for a minute.
The only way the world pop is gonna stabilize is by death - war/famine/disease - take your pick.
Or a conservative who actually understands the meaning of the word.
We consider it extravagant, thanks.
I don't think it's unreasonable to think that it's a good idea to use less power. But why on earth does this stupid woman need to have her electric bills skyrocket before she can start saving power? Why not just go out and buy energy saving bulbs, check the insulations, etc., etc., BEFORE the price shoots up, if she thinks that's the virtuous thing to do?
Or does she enjoy watching everyone suffer? Probably, knowing how warming many liberals find that experience.
I know a politically conservative family with four children. The lady of the house has had nasty things said to her in the past out in public because she has that many in tow.
Socialists (aka Liberals) hate children but use them for their political agenda even though they claim to care for them and ask people to vote "for the children."
Teddy Roosevelt believed it was the obligation of the right sort of people (such as himself, and Rabbi Lapin, and me) to reproduce generously.
I find this statement to be so curious. Not only is it a very self-aggrandizing statement for a holy man (or any man for that matter ) to make, but this putz has just given all but his youngest daughter a terrible insult, one which would be impossible for the older ones to overcome. Gee thanks, dad!
How odd...
Nuclear energy should be and should have been the answer years ago were it not for the nutjob "no-nuke" environmentalists. My father worked at one for years, I worked there for a short time. The ultimate answer for the future is diversity, a combination of nuclear, solar, wind AND petroleum. Maybe "hot fusion" using plasma, but I don't know if cold fusion will ever come to pass. The crux of the whole thing is that there really is nothing to worry about, there are plenty of answers already. Our doomsday will not come about because of an energy crisis.
I just hope your 64 future grand-children appreciate their apportioned elbow room.
It's called "Jewish Guilt" and if it leads you to living like a caveman more power (pun intended) to you!
And the only reason your doing it... is for the children.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.