[.cnI redruM]

No, but since neither side of this debate can either

a) Mathematically represent what happened

or

b) Mathematically model what will happen next according to their specified theories, given a set of environmental stimuli,

I'd say the journey isn't complete on explaining how living things change over generations.

[Moral Hazard]

"No, but since neither side of this debate can either

a) Mathematically represent what happened

or

b) Mathematically model what will happen next according to their specified theories, given a set of environmental stimuli,

I'd say the journey isn't complete on explaining how living things change over generations."

A has already been done.
B is very difficult to do because not only is the problem extremely complicated, but there are inputs that aren't biological in origin that we don't know about. Understand that we can't even effectively model the effects of gravity for more than 2 objects. That doesn't exactly refute the theory of gravity, does it?